Corporation contracting with the Quebec Medical Experts

The doubtfully RRQ medical honesty reason of there request after I inform them to be present at the Civil small claim court on February 04 1991, concerning the illegal CTRSM medical feed pay check seizure under the false identification of a CSST recovery  to recover the Dr. Brunet arbitrage feed ...under contract with Medisys the CTRSM medical office the same corporation used by the RRQ.

The civil small claim first audience. The RRQ 25 mars 1991 letter

Document of Dr. Pierre Laberge
(Quebec Medical Experts Association Member)
See : Translation of the French original Dr. Pierre Laberge Evaluation reproduction by Martine Yesler and
commented by Serge Morel



§
  Medical Bureaux Régie des rentes du Québec (RRQ) 

Régie des rentes du Québec (RRQ)

Letter adress to: Doctor Roger Dorion,
Chief of Medicine Medical Bureau
Régie des Rentes du Québec,

 DOCTOR PIERRE LABERGE 
Psychiatrist 
Community Psychiatric Center 

Jean-Talon Hospital 
7345, rue Gamier, 
Montréal, Québec H2E 2A1 

PL/gb PIERRE LABERGE, M.D.

Psychiatrist 

Member of the  Quebec
 Medical Expert Society

 

 

DOCTOR PIERRE LABERGE 
Psychiatrist 
Community Psychiatric Center 

Jean-Talon Hospital 
7345, rue Gamier, 
Montréal, Québec H2E 2A1 

May 27, 1991
Doctor Roger Dorion, 
Chief of Medicine 
Medical Bureau 
Régie des Rentes du Québec
P.O. Box 5200 Québec (Québec) G1K 7S9
PATIENT:   SERGE MOREL 
NAS:  216 366 971
V/D: pension of disability
Examination done on May 27, 1991 
PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION 
PURPOSE OF THE EXAMINATION : 
I proceeded with the evaluation of the above referenced patient, at the request of Doctor Roger Dorion of the Régie des Rentes du Québec. (Pension funds). The purpose of this examination was to determine if the applicant has a severe and prolonged disability; unable to hold wage paying job, for a long term. If he is older than 60 years, making him unable to perform any wage paying job such as his previous one. 

STUDY OF THE RELEVANT FILE DOCUMENTS: 
Although it is not a question of a medical report, it is impossible to retract a bulky document of forty-three (43) pages produced by the attorney, Guy E Dulude, on December 4, 1989, this document reports the adventures, could we say, of a honest bus driver which, not only satisfy the requirements of his employer towards the end of 1970, but also took advantage of his spare time to work on a project for the establishment of a radio communication system for transportation control, which will reduce operation costs, a project known by the initials of CDRIL (Administration council for international and local references, this is the subject). 

It appears this project, from the beginning, was accepted very favorably by various authorities, the employer, the governmental officials, so much so, that famous project CDRIL even obtained a corporate charter & registration under the Canadian federal law . 

All these facts are reported in a report that we can read with great interest from the beginning until the end. Let us summarize by saying the creator and the instigator of the project quickly arrived at this conviction that there was a plot to steal its discovery, a plot with the multiple ramifications and having for consequence many adventures, attacks, car race, followings, etc. 

In September 1985, we had to expect it, the problem became a psychiatric problem. Some on-the job accidents having occurred meanwhile are used more or less of pretexts to make the all work situation worst. Some on the job accidents having occurred meanwhile are used more or less as pretexts to make the work situation worst. 

See:1 Basic Information concerning
"on-the job accidents having occurred"

The ditch grows between the self-educated bus driver which believes to hold the invention which will make him a celebrity and the transport company which finds him increasingly cumbersome to have as a driver an individual who thinks he is a victim of an international plot and makes it clear to be extremely scared for his own safety. 

He comes to the conclusion also to be worried about the possibility of sabotage of the vehicles he could drive, apprehending to be the object of a murder attempt covered up by accident, and the subject comes up with all kinds of requirements which are not at the agreeable to the employer, and asks the employer to release him from responsibilities in case of an accident would occur.

The ditch grows hollow, and as it happened in those kind of situations apparently crazy and eccentric but that have a certain logic, the man alone against the whole world finds burning defenders in the person of his doctor, psychiatrist, psychologist. 

See: 2 Basic Information concerning the person of his doctor, psychiatrist, psychologist

The expertise ordered by the employer have always this ungrateful role in psychiatric clinic to consider the facts by removing them from their emotional or magic gangue, with the conclusion that the Victim exists only in paranoiac imaginary . The things are known differently but are similar to the observations of Doctor Robert Brunet, and the clinical data of this examination will imply the same diagnostic (?????) in a letter from 23 July1990, Doctor Robert Brunet explained and shown the circularity of the paranoiac reasoning, so that the psychiatrist finds himself in a paradoxical position to supplement a certificate of medical disability concerning an individual whose principal symptom is precisely to deny that it is sick! 

It's useless to enter all the details, all these documents are read once again like a true novel, which it is enough to mention however, independently of undeniable pathology psychiatric, that the dismissal and then disability seem to be justified for reasons of safety. This note has its importance in measurement or, in spite of its disease, the subject, to a certain point remains active, functional, hyper-organized, and as it will be mentioned in conclusion that an incurable pathology is not necessarily absolutely and completely invalidating. 

CLINICAL PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION : 
This meeting proceeded according to a known diagram, I would like to mention that both the patient and doctor enjoyed the session. 

The patient is described as a short, very active, very detailed on his extraordinary personal adventure and his dispute being sick since six (6) years ! With the same energy, he will say he was accepted as an immigrant in the United States "for political reason" (sic) based on an investigation of the F.B.I. All its family was invited to follow him. He is sure to be the object of a special attention on behalf of various individuals of the national and international political world, who do not forgive his discovery. Like all those people he is ostracized and even more, still threatens his security. He declared that his suit case full of documents disappeared as well as his wife's car. 

Concerning his allegation of: 
"...as an immigrant in the United States"
"...as well as his wife's car."
See: 3 Basic Information concerning Dr. Pierre LABERGE, he possessed information and had information at his disposition for the robbery of my wife car and my immigration statue in transit.

Should it be added that self-criticism in similar circumstances is absolutely unthinkable, the emotional position and in a certain direction the secondary benefit, including those to be the Victim, override any realistic consonance, if we can use this expression. The contents of the thought are entirely invaded by the discovery, and all energies are directed on the self-defense mode in order to preserve the copyrights, but especially the life of the author threatened by those who want to steal the famous discovery. Most paradoxical of this situation is at this end we are losing sight of the fact and do not know anymore of what consists this famous discovery. The characteristic of this situation and of this completely pathognomonic attitude of the disease, it is the discoverer who takes all the place and we ends up to forget the discovery. 

At all events, and we can bring some nuances and other comments on this interesting clinical case. The diagnosis of paranoia is retained, and this actual doctor becomes circumspect and thoughtful by noting that certain professionals in the field of psychology and psychiatry missed this such an obviousness statement. While adding of course, in order to dissipate any ambiguity and the address of a possible prosecutor, that the diagnosis of paranoia does not imply any judgment is not prejudicial and is based directly on the handbooks of psychiatric nosology. We are talking about a disease which does not have anything defamatory, but is restrictive in certain way but not completely, which is the direction of this conclusion. 

See:4 Basic Information concerning his 
psychiatry CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SERGE MOREL 
N.A.S. : 216 366 971 
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 

The patient of course denies to have been or to be paranoiac. In his opinion, which is perfectly his most legitimate right, his case is a matter of international espionage ! Very strange and mysterious events happened which consolidated him in this opinion that powerful people are after him. It is easy to understand that in a such context and because of the imminence of the danger (that it is real or imaginary does not change anything with the problem), it could be contra-indicates that the subject occupies an employment , some of its actions could be likely to endanger the entourage in a case where he would like to protect himself from a possible attack. 
It is contra-indicated that the subject can occupy his usual occupation as bus driver, or an equivalent position in terms of responsibilities. 

On the other hand, he could do very well at work in another field, he has talents, he says in renovation, drives his truck in full safety for the public, can do various work enabling him to earn its living reasonably. 

In other words, and like it was even implied previously, even so he has an incurable psychiatric disease, in fact a traditional paranoia syndrome leading to megalomania and the percussion complex, does not imply necessarily only in another order of ideas, apart from its combat with the powers which are jealous of him, that the subject is not able to be useful and productive by the means of various activities or he will benefit from his remarkable determination which we hope could give great results, if this determination were used correctly. 

To finally conclude, the subject does not consider himself an invalid, he knows that he can do and carry out things, earn its living, etc.., but he has not escaped the actual circular reasoning in this file for several years now: "if I am not invalid, I am right!". This reasoning is a sophism, the subject can not be invalid very well within the meaning of the law for any kind of remunerative work, in the same time maintaining his delirious beliefs. It's at least the humble opinion of the undersigned. 

I hope I answered to your questions relating to , and we must agree with it, this unusual problem. 
Best regards, 

PL/gb PIERRE LABERGE, M.D. 
 Psychiatrist 
 Member of the  Quebec
 Medical Expert Society

 

 
 

  a

The RRQ involvement in the Canadian criminal conspiracy

To situate the context of this 5 page of Dr. Pierre Laberge medical psychiatric
Evaluation requested by the RRQ.
See: SERGE MOREL ANNOTATION

1 Basic Information concerning 
"on-the job accidents having occurred"

In order to understand the interpretation of the words " on the job  accidents" for Pierre Laberge (expert) . For this doctor, the word 'works accident' includes the attempts of murder, perjury in front of the court, falsification of official documents under investigation etc., I  let  you compare these statements with certain witnesses who lived these events. 

Moreover, as  noted  here, Dr. Laberge hid the fact that he was an expert employed via contract with Medisy. The three doctor, LABERGE< PELLETIER and SIOUFFI were the only ones to declare that I was mental incapacitated. Their diagnosis was not recognized by the Ministry of transport despite the fact they transmitted a report to the Transport Minister permits  by the CTRSM and Medisy. 


2 Basic Information concerning the person of his doctor, psychiatrist, psychologist

To identify these characters:

The doctor: Dr. Alain Gauthier: 
Dr. Alain Gauthier refused to sign the request for absence dated on  September 9, 1985.  This request was to cover the fact that according to the psychiatrist Dr. Coriolan only Dr. Pelletier give the reason why he put me in "medical leave of absence" from September 1985 to 14 Mars 1986.  Doctor Gauthier gave me a permission to come back to work on 04 June 1986. 

This medical leave of absence in September was required by an administrator of the CTRSM and endorsed by their practitioner under contract with the corporation Sante Medicy Dr. Pelletier.  The same Dr. Pelletier who committed perjury in court by declaring to the judge that he changed his report after having some discussions with the PAE and Denise Laplante director of the CTRSM.  This Perjury has been covered by the CTRSM lawyer as well as the FTQ who appointed their lawyer Maitre Morin to represent me but did not disclose to him that Dr Pelletier altered his original report. 

The perjury of Dr. Pelletier was covered by the FTQ and only the articles relating to the PAE were stricken, but not the perjury of Dr. Pelletier.  Mr. Yvon Fontaine wanted to come to testify on the criminal implication from the PAE by Dr. Pelletier, however his testimony was refused by the FTQ in agreement with the CTRSM.  I let  you evaluate the letters, of the former vice president of the union Mr. Claude Boivert, and Robert Boutin president of the PAE in September 1985 and of  Mr. Yvon Fontaine in December 1989.  Other witnesses will be able to confirm it. 

NB Letters of these testimony are disponible on the public web www.ACILR-CDRIL.com

A psychiast: Dr. Frantzie Coriolan

Dr. Frantzie Coriolan refused to fill out a medical report for the insurance from the SSQ with the CTRSM identifying the medical leave of absence of September 1985 and by the CTRSM on February 24, 1986.  You will be able to see this date on the report to  Canada-Life insurance.  The report, which it produced on February 28, is addressed to the appropriate authority only to certify that I was in good mental and physical health 
.

See: Dr. Coriolant medical report 


3 Basic Information concerning my exile and my car robbery, Dr. Pierre LABERGE possessed information and had information at his disposition for my immigration statue in transit and the robbery of my wife car.

Dr. Pierre LABERGE was advised concerning my US exile but treat that irrespecfolly by his words 
"immigrant in the United States "for political reason" (sic) based on an investigation of the F.B.I." Its family  follow him
See: Immigration paper



Concerning the robbery of my wife car
Pierre LABERGE was informed the police repport was made at Saint-Luc city and 
the owner was arrested at Saint-Hubert city 

Extract of  The Abridgment Addendum II at the englis correction

On April 18, 1991 - The time we completed the U.S. immigration application process, my 1985 Oldsmobile station wagon was stolen in St. Luc, at the Desjardins Bank parking lot. At the end of June 1991, we were advised they found it in a garage in St. Hubert where the mayor Mr. Pierre D. Girard, my former lawyer, was associated in the C135 thousants dollars lawsuit cover-up settlement by the MSSTC.

See: Proof of the stolen car by "la St-Maurice" the Quebec french insurance

See: The Quebec Bar association register letter confirmation of the C 135 thousands dollars offert 
 


4Basic Information concerning his 
psychiatry CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Dr. Pierre LABERGE was informed that the document of Dr. Robert BRUNET disputed by the controls of the revenues of Quebec was declared  invalid by the CTRSM which advised the court. 

Dr. LABERGE was also informed of the false evidence of Dr.PELLETIER and distort allegations of lawyer of the CTRSM and of the FTQ. 

Besides, Judge Simon Brossard himself  declared to the audience that this file concerns the Ministry of Labour. 

The Control of the Revenues of Quebec was also invited at the hearing of the court of the small credits. 

To protect  itself from its criminal participation in a Canadian conspiracy governmental and Québécoise, the Control of the Revenues of Quebec decided to dispute Dr. BRUNET dispute  of the Medisy corporation related to the CTRSM under governmental contract, while being useful of Dr. Pierre LABERGE who is identified as being a Psychiatrist of the Community Psychiatric Center of Hospital Jean-Heel but which was also a medical expert of Quebec. 

It would be also the reason of the cover up of this same Control of the revenues which refused to emit a letter to Pierre Rochefort attorney at law,  this one claiming their verbal opinion by telephone  on the explanations of their re-establishment of the pension to Serge Morel which had been cut following the reports of  Dr LABERGE. 

Their answer was "He is lucky to receive this money and does not hope for anything more !". 

The Control of the Revenues of Quebec governs by the Bank of Development and of Investment of Quebec implied criminally in the file of ACILR/CDRIL, restored the pension without any other reason .  This control restored one year later the pension of disability than she had cancelled in August 1991 and this after the deposit of the report of their expert Dr. Pierre LABERGE, and that  four days after the reception of my deposition on August 14, 1992.  Deposition which was deposited following the deadlines by the law regarding the illegal payment of this revenue. 

By this deposition, I warned them being agree with their decision and to transfer this criminal medical file to the IVAC (Compensation for the Victims Criminel act ), and to the Ministry for Justice for end of Criminal investigation from where it raised. 

See: The letter on august 14 1992, 
Adressed to the Régie des Rente du Québec 
Document fond on the second disket of this Serge Morel file
LetterEgRRQSBourssaKimbell14_8_1992

        The Minister for the Justice of Canada, Mrs Kim Cambell,  confirmed my statements in his letter on  September 28  1992.  My letter dated on December 11 1992 that I had forwarded to him remained without answer as well as the letter document of May 13, 1993 sent to all Canadian Prime Ministers.  Mr. Romanof was the only one to advice me that he had transferred the file to his minister from Justice. 

See the  Presentatiel report 
Regarding the  FTQ, Dr. Brunet and 
the STRSM (CTRSM), on the web in french 
www.ACILR-CDRIL.com

The 'Presententiel'  Report deposited to the small Credit court  includes the charge of the criminal extortion of the CTRSM.  I hold the proof of this false evidence of lawyer of the CTRSM and the criminal endorsing of the trade-union representatives of the FTQ .  The two lawyers covered up this criminal extortion which went back to one year before the judgement of Guy E DULUDE, c.r.  I am in possession of this recording on tape which was given to me by the court of the Law of Longueuil. 

See on the web in french www.ACILR-CDRIL.com
the "Rapport Presententiel" 
deposited to the small Credit page
and also 
the report submitted with the IVAC 
written by two Lawyers page


 


 
 
 
Immigration paper

1) Paper from US Immigration

2) Paper from the RRQ dated mai 16, 1991 for the US immigration so, 
before his evaluation of Dr. Pierre LABERGE dated on mai 27, 1991 

 3) Five medical report


1) Paper from US Immigration
TRANSCRIP
APPL ADV NOT WANT SP OR CHILD REN TO IMM AT  THIS TIME
-ALSO HAS POLITICAL PROBLEM WITH QUE.
HAD FBI & CIA WORKING ON HIS CASE IN NEW HAVEN, CT
PP#MB427174



2) Paper from the RRQ dated mai 16, 1991 for the US immigration so, 
before his evaluation dated on mai 27, 1991 
 



3) Five medical report
A) From Saint Jean sur Richelieu Hospital Dr. Coriolan
psychiatric,  one dated 1986 
B) the other one sign by the Saint Jean sur Richelieu Hospital for the US immigration dated on mars 15, 1991
C) from the Montréal Saint Justine Hospital dated on mars 20, 1991
D) Dr. Joan A William US MD, US Panel physician dated mai 13, 1991

 And 
Fallowing these medical the Advise I gave to the to transfert my case to the  Indemnisation Victim Criminal Act Commission with a Medical repport of my Familly Doctor for 10 years of good healt Dr. Lehuu made for my driver bus permit and dated december 15, 1992.



A) From Saint Jean sur Richelieu Hospital Dr. Coriolan
psychiatric,  one dated 1986 


B) the other one sign by the Saint Jean sur Richelieu Hospital for 
the US immigration dated on mars 15, 1991
C) from the Montréal Saint Justine Hospital dated on mars 20, 1991
D) Dr. Joan A William US MD, US Panel physician dated mai 13, 1991


E) Fallowing these medical the Advise I gave to the to transfert my case to the  Indemnisation Victim Criminal Act Commission with a Medical repport of my Familly Doctor for 10 years of good healt Dr. Lehuu made for my driver bus permit and dated december 15, 1992.


Quebec Bar Asssociation

The certified letter from the Quebec Bar Asssociation of the CTRSM Canadian 135 thousands dallars offered .




The stealing car proof